What we ask them to do every week in the therapy room is to "heal" themselves, through talking. We are I believe hoping to guide them along a path of self reflection, and to force them to examine connections in their lives - some obvious, others not quite so - to see ways in which their experiences are contributed to, by them, and the others - many others - they live with in the world. We have theories about how and why we do this - right and wrong ways, philosophies about what is helpful and what is not. Yet when I am in the room with clients, and they are sad or angry or jubilant I often feel imposing. In spite of my best effort to maintain the stance - "I am a client-focused and directed therapist" - in spite of the notion that their goals/aspirations/hopes are what guide the process - it is shaky ground I travel.
What do we know to be true universally about the safest way to provide the care we give? How are we certain of the strength - emotional strength - or our clients? When would be know that therapy is doing more harm than good? I don't have full answers to these questions. I think perhaps that we are - I am - often running with scissors.